Slide decks from Brussels conference on Component-Level SEP Licensing (November 12, 2019)

During and after the Brussels conference on Component-Level SEP Licensing that I organized on Tuesday, I've received various requests for the panelists' slide decks. Fortunately, all the speakers who used slides have provided them to me by now and authorized their publication.

I'll also do a follow-up in the form of a summary (with some soundbites).

Now, let me provide links to the slide decks in the chronological order of the presentations:

• Dave Djavaherian, PacTechLaw: Access to FRAND Licenses Under the Contract Laws

• Professor Joachim Henkel, Technical University of Munich: Patent royalties in the IoT industry: an economics perspective

• Eric Stasik, Avvika: Component-Level Licensing -- Licensing practitioner's perspective on fallout from FTC v. Qualcomm ruling

• Evelina Kurgonaite, Fair Standards Alliance: Could Judge Koh's reasoning be adopted under Art. 102 TFUE?

• Professor Rafal Sikorski, Adam Mickiewicz University and SMM Legal: Antitrust complaints over SEP licensing

• I filled in for Kent Baker (who couldn't travel that week) to provide a quick outline of the Continental v. Avanci et al. case in the Northern District of California

• Bram Nijhof, Taylor Wessing: Abstract on the evolution of national case law on SEP injunctions since Huawei v. ZTE

• Maurits Dolmans, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton: The proportionality requirement under the EU enforcement directive (with certain references to the German injunction reform debate)

Follow @FOSSpatents

Share with other professionals via LinkedIn:

Share|